Abbot’s Act Of Stealing And Ethics Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Abbots Act Of Stealing And Ethics. Answer: Facts: Abbot is a philosophy Student who has faces deprivation and poverty Abbot suffers from vitamin deficiency and therefore is advised by the doctor to eat meat which he cannot afford Abbots friends encourage him to steal meat from Ms Costellos grocery shop saying that stores have an ethical obligation to the society Abbot steals from Ms. Costellos grocery store and justifies the act of stealing saying Ms. Costello has an ethical duty to the students. Issue The issue in this scenario is whether the Abbots act of stealing is justified. Test: For the purpose of assessing whether the act of stealing is justified it is essential to assess whether the theft of meat from the shop Ms Costello it is important to assess the facts of the case By the principles of ethical theories. Every member of the society has the obligation to comply with social duties and respect the rights of the others in the society (Van Hooft, 2014). Further it can be stated that government has framed certain regulations and codified the same as laws so that people comply with same and ensure that anarchy is not promoted in the society. According to the ethical theory of virtue ethics it can be said that the actions of individuals reflect their character (Carr, 2016). Virtues can be considered to be inherent qualities of individuals and the same are acquired over time. Virtue ethics emphasizes on the moral character and virtues of individuals in assessing whether their actions are in line with the ethical standards. Virtue ethics can be considered to be one of the major approaches in normative ethics. Virtues ethicists attend to virtues primarily as consequentiaists attend to consequences of actions (Segon Booth, 2015). It can be stated according to section 657.2 of the Canadian Criminal Code that an individual can be charged with theft if he is found with possession of another persons property which had been acquired by the commission of an offense (Laws-lois.justice.gc.ca, 2018). The act of stealing the property of another person is not only unethical but also illegal. It can be said that when a person is found with the possession of an item of the shop for which he has not paid, such person can be called a shoplifter. Application of the test According to the theory of virtue ethics as discussed earlier, it can be said that the act of stealing does not reflect good virtues or moral character of an individual. The act of stealing is inherently unethical and cannot be considered to be an option to alleviate oneself of poverty and deprivation. The act of stealing itself is harmful and has a criminal intent. In the given scenario Abbot further went on to justify the act of stealing by saying that Ms Costello has a social obligation to the students. Justifying theft as a matter of right also reflects low moral character of Abbot. Not only is theft considered to be unethical but also illegal. Abbots act of taking possession of the property of Ms Costellos store without paying for the same constitutes theft which is defined and labeled by the Canadian Criminal Code as an offense. Therefore it can be said that Abbots act was unethical and illegal. References: Van Hooft, S. (2014).Understanding virtue ethics. Routledge. Carr, D. (2016). Virtue, character and emotion in people professions: towards a virtue ethics of interpersonal professional conduct. InTowards Professional Wisdom(pp. 113-126). Routledge. 'Criminal Code' (Laws-lois.justice.gc.ca, 2018) https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/ accessed 25 March 2018 Segon, M., Booth, C. (2015). Virtue: The missing ethics element in emotional intelligence.Journal of Business Ethics,128(4), 789-802.